Scientara

Open access publishing

Five journals, one editorial standard.

Scientara publishes open access research across materials, medicine, computational biology, energy and the environment. Every journal states its review model on its own page. Where an author and a reviewer both agree, the reports are published alongside the article, with their own DOIs, so a reader can see the argument that produced it.

Journals

Each title has its own editorial board, scope and review policy.

What we commit to

These are not aspirations. They are how the platform is built, and where a promise is enforced by the system rather than by good intentions, we say so.

Decisions are editorial
Editors cannot see whether an author has paid. Payment records are not returned to an editorial account at all, and no article is held in production over an unpaid invoice.
Anonymity is enforced, not requested
On a double-anonymised journal, a reviewer's account cannot retrieve author identity by any route, including the manuscript file. The anonymised copy is generated by the platform, not by the author.
Reviewers are credited
Review records can be pushed to ORCID. Where reports are published they receive a DOI and are citable.
Nothing is quietly withdrawn
Corrections, expressions of concern and retractions are published as separate items with their own DOIs. The original article stays online and citable, marked.
Time to first decision
Published per journal, updated quarterly, including the months we miss the target.

For authors

Submission opens with each journal's first call for papers. In the meantime, the author guidelines describe what we will ask for, and the policies set out licensing, fees, waivers and ethics in full.

Read the author guidelines